The source of these listings is Media Bias/Fact Check. The methodolgy can be found here
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News) is an independent online media outlet. MBFC is dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices. We also provide original articles on media bias, journalism and politics. On our social media pages we provide current news and events from low biased sources as well as all content posted on our website. Media Bias/Fact Check is owned solely by Dave Van Zandt. Dave has spent more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher on media bias and its role in political influence. The methodolgy can be found here.
Categorizing media by bias is an imprecise at best. Certainly some of these categories could be questioned. Those who obtain news from Fox News and Breitbart – considered right here – will likely disagree with the categorization of the New York Times and the Washington Post as center left instead of left.
This difference in perspective of media bias is a striking sign of the depth of the polarization in this country. Those on the right think that their far-right media positions are center. Those who read the New York Times recognize that the paper is slightly left leaning but the facts are from the least biased sources. The “center” media seems to be accepted by the left but is not typically accepted by the right.
This is the core of our differences – how we perceive the bias. Studies conducted in 2013 comparing primary right, center and left media found that, with the exception of Brietbart, that the left and right media were similar in what they covered. As noted elsewhere on this site, the more important influence is how much attention is paid to various topics by the reader. For example, readers of conservative media do not pay much attention to allegations of police brutality but do pay a lot of attention to the Benghazi investigation. Conversely, readers of left leaning media do not pay much attention to Benghazi but are very interested in instances of police brutality.
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources.
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.