The Most Alarming Part Of Barr’s Speech Was Its Angrily Partisan Tone

In Judiciary and Courts On
- Updated

But the most revealing part of Barr’s speech was its angrily partisan tone, an us-vs.-them belligerence unbefitting the nation’s chief law enforcement officer. No doubt, the attorney general — any attorney general — is a political appointee. He or she has a proper role as a political ally of the president, and in implementing and promoting the president’s chosen policies.

As the nation’s chief law enforcement officer, however, the attorney general also stands separate from and above the ordinary Cabinet secretary, able to impartially administer justice, without regard to political considerations. While other Cabinet secretaries may campaign for political candidates, it has been the practice of attorneys general to refrain from such partisan activity.

Certainly, attorneys general have ideological points of view, and they are permitted to express and, where appropriate, implement them. Edwin Meese III, President Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, famously used a series of speeches to lay out a theory of constitutional interpretation — the “jurisprudence of original intent” — and outline the administration’s plans to promote that approach in litigating cases.

Read full article

You may also read!

The Grim, Unmentioned Downside Of the Employment Records Trump Is Hyping

Following the release of June employment data on Thursday


How Generations of Russians Have Tried to Influence American Elections

RIGGEDAmerica, Russia, and One Hundred Years of Covert Electoral


Mobile Sliding Menu