Standard Metrics Won’t Suffice. Here’s How To Neasure Trump’s Failures So They Register With Right-Wingers.

In Budget, Misleading Information On
- Updated

fter a recent column about President Trump’s lackluster economic record, my inbox flooded with furious, incredulous emails from Trump fans. They all knew, in their gut, that their charismatic leader’s achievements — on the economy, public health or any other arena — must be the greatest ever.

Because he’d said so, after all.

Sure, 29 million Americans are claiming unemployment; at least 183,000 have died from the coronavirus; and some 20 percent of small businesses that existed pre-pandemic are closed. But no matter the statistics, no matter the citations from government agencies or private analysts, Trump followers refuse to accept that this president’s legacy might be in any way lacking. Especially compared with his predecessor!

As federal unemployment benefits expire, tell us what this means for you and your family

It seemed like any suggestion that Trump’s numbers are unusually bad, no matter how well-documented, was doomed to get written off as fake news. Then, it hit me:

Maybe what’s needed are different units for measuring the Trump administration’s failures and scandals, since the standard metrics aren’t registering. His record should be quantified in scales that a Fox News viewer might be more familiar with: not body counts or dollars, but Benghazis and Solyndras.

Read full article

You may also read!

Trump’s Historic Assault On the Civil Service Was Four Years In the Making

President Trump’s extraordinary directive allowing his administration to weed


Five Myths About Shareholders

Investing is a mystery to many. In theory, the


Mobile Sliding Menu