Newspaper Endorsements — 2016 Presidential Election

The 2016 newspaper endorsements for president in 2016 represent a fascinating episode in our search for facts, a better understanding of bias and the role of the media . It also sheds light on how to wrestle with “balanced” reporting vs. “accurate” reporting. Prior to the 2016 election, the media and the public had been adhering to a “both sides” approach based on the unspoken assumption that both sides should have equal air time in order to appear unbiased and “fair”. While this approach seems fair, it led to a major misrepresentation of many facts. There was also a tolerance for lies, insults and misleading information exacerbated by the constant repetition of misleading information. This media approach compromised accuracy of reporting in favor of “fairness”.

So how do we put the newspaper editorials in context? Even given a “both sides” media approach, an overall shift to the right and concentration of ownership of local newspapers — the newspaper editorials in 2016 were overwhelmingly in favor of the Democratic candidate, 500 endorsements vs. 30 endorsements for the Republican candidate and 122 either no endorsement or for other. Why did we see such overwhelming endorsement for the Democratic candidate?

An intriguing idea is that newspapers were more focused on accuracy rather than “both-sidedness” when the time came to issue an opinion or endorsement. Editorials were not necessarily enthusiastically supporting the Democratic candidate. They were very clear about their opinion of the danger and unfitness presented by the Republican candidate. These opinions were courageous in many communities, especially rural and conservative ones. The courage is even more striking because it is widely known that newspaper endorsements are not persuasive with voters and are usually ignored. Many of these newspapers risked their perceived credibility, their subscriptions and their reputation in their communities when they voiced their opinions.

In the aftermath, we know that the a large segment of voters ignored the newspaper editorial opinions and voted for the Republican candidate. This outcome does not make these editorials “wrong”. It does raise the possibility that the newspapers were basing their opinions on facts and accuracy at the end of the day. When it came to voicing opinion, they did not succumb to “both-sidedness”.

 

 

Newspaper endorsements in the United States presidential election, 2016

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Various notable newspapers made endorsements of candidates in the 2016 United States presidential election, as follows. Tables below indicate which candidate each publication endorsed in the United States presidential election, 2012 (where known) and include only endorsements for the general election. Primary endorsements are separately listed at newspaper endorsements in the United States presidential primaries, 2016.

Media journalist Jim Rutenberg writes that endorsements in the 2016 presidential election are distinguished by “blunt condemnation” of the Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and by a “save the Republic” tone.[1] Reasons cited by editorial boards for refusing to endorse Trump included his lack of experience in government at any level, as well as, among other reasons, editors’ belief that Trump was profoundly ignorant of most areas of public policy, lacked character traits considered desirable in a US president, and took a cavalier attitude towards civil liberties, including, but not limited to, freedom of speech and of the press. Trump’s harsh attitude to the freedom of the press, such as his plan to “open up” libel laws, was viewed by many newspaper editorial boards as a threat to their profession and industry.

Trump received endorsements from only 20 daily newspapers and six weekly newspapers nationwide, of which only two, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the (Jacksonville) Florida Times-Union, had circulations of above 100,000.[2] The small number of endorsements received by Trump was unprecedented in American history for a candidate from a major party.[3][4][5]

Among the United States’ 100 largest newspapers by paid circulation, 57 endorsed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton,[6] while only two, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Florida Times-Union, endorsed Trump. Four (the Chicago Tribune, the Detroit News, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and the Charleston (South Carolina) Post and Courier) endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson,[7] while three other newspapers (USA Today, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel) specifically discouraged their readers from voting for Trump. Clinton won support from not only traditionally Democratic-leaning newspapers, but also traditionally non-political and conservative newspapers,[1][2] including those which had “either never before supported a Democrat or had not in many decades … or had never endorsed any presidential candidate, like USA Today.”[1] The endorsements by a handful of newspapers of third party candidates, including independent candidate Evan McMullin as well as Johnson, broke from the usual practice of newspaper editorial boards endorsing a candidate from one of the two major parties.[2][8]

Summary of newspaper and magazine endorsements in the 2016 United States presidential election

Candidate

Daily Weekly Magazines College International Total
Hillary Clinton

243

148 15 77 17 500
No endorsement 64 13 0 5 0 82
Not Donald Trump 8 2 4 12 4 30
Donald Trump 20 6 0 0 1 27
Gary Johnson 9 0 0 0 0 9
Split Endorsement 2 0 0 0 0 2
Evan McMullin 1 0 0 0 0 1
Not Hillary Clinton 1 0 0 0 0 1

 

 

Daily newspapers

Summary of daily newspapers

Candidate Endorsements Breakdown by 2012 endorsement
Hillary Clinton

243

99 Barack Obama; 47 Mitt Romney; 19 No endorsement; 1 Split endorsement; 76 Undetermined
No endorsement

64

38 Mitt Romney; 2 Barack Obama; 2 No endorsement; 11 Undetermined
Donald Trump

20

14 Mitt Romney; 6 Undetermined
Gary Johnson

9

2 Barack Obama; 5 Mitt Romney; 2 Undetermined
Not Donald Trump

8

2 Mitt Romney; 1 Barack Obama; 4 No endorsement; 1 Undetermined
Split endorsement

2

2 Split endorsement
Evan McMullin

1

1 Undetermined
Not Hillary Clinton

1

1 Undetermined

 

Mobile Sliding Menu

Common Ground
We don’t need to search any further for common ground in our country. We have it.
We all want the same things – a safe, prosperous, free, democratic nation with opportunity for all. At the same time, we will all be harmed if our democracy, our free press, our Constitution and our core American values are threatened. We will all certainly be harmed if reckless behavior triggers any number of potential armed conflicts.

None of us know how this will all play out so let's make a deal. Let’s get up to speed on the issues, establish some facts, take action and watch what happens together . . .